Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Embarq 10Mbps » pathetic
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:

Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: pathetic

896k isn't an ADSL limitation; they could push around 3 meg up with ADSL2+...they simply chose 896k....for whatever reason; hopefully that'll get bumped up to 1024k when it's launched nationwide.

I live close enough to a RT to easily get 10 (or even 20) meg service, but it doesn't have a DSLAM...so, hopefully, when this package is launched nationwide, they'll already have (or will in the very near future) be deploying a DSLAM at my RT....10meg/900k would be really nice....
wispagod

join:2001-06-28
House Springs, MO

Re: pathetic

well at least when the only thing around was dial up , it was easy buy a 2400bauf or s 28.8 baud modem gezz i miss the simplicity of the good ol day's

Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: pathetic

said by wispagod See Profile :

well at least when the only thing around was dial up , it was easy buy a 2400bauf or s 28.8 baud modem gezz i miss the simplicity of the good ol day's
I really like the latest and greatest thing, but even then, I know your exact feelings; there's times when things weren't so advanced that choices were a lot simpler.

MrMoody
But the Grinch ... did Not.

join:2002-09-03
Smithfield, NC
·Embarq
·Skype
·magicjack.com

Actually this is not strictly true. In order to run 3 Mb up, the equipment must support Annex M, which the current modems do not. A firmware update might do it or it could be that the hardware is not capable of it at all. Then there's the DSLAMs as well. 896k is the approximate net speed you get from the maximum ADSL2+ 1024k connection.

Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: pathetic

said by MrMoody See Profile :

Actually this is not strictly true. In order to run 3 Mb up, the equipment must support Annex M, which the current modems do not. A firmware update might do it or it could be that the hardware is not capable of it at all. Then there's the DSLAMs as well. 896k is the approximate net speed you get from the maximum ADSL2+ 1024k connection.
My mistake.

I would certainly hope Embarq has been putting in ADSL2+M cards into their DSLAM....I can see the modems not being able to handle it, but that would only require a new modem; big deal.

The one silver lining about ADSL2+ and ADSL2+M is that it supports port bonding; therefore, we could theoretically see speeds around 96 meg down and 14 meg up if they wanted to...I highly doubt they'll do this though.

MrMoody
But the Grinch ... did Not.

join:2002-09-03
Smithfield, NC
·Embarq
·Skype
·magicjack.com

Re: pathetic

I'd pay $89 for 20/2, and have one of the fastest residential connections in this entire FiOS-free state.

But I doubt they'll do it any time soon either for several reasons, among which are: No competition at that level in virtually any of their territory, special customer equipment & pro install required, increased support headaches, increased more difficult maintenance, limited port availability, bandwidth hogs would be even more so ...

Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: pathetic

said by MrMoody See Profile :

I'd pay $89 for 20/2, and have one of the fastest residential connections in this entire FiOS-free state.

But I doubt they'll do it any time soon either for several reasons, among which are: No competition at that level in virtually any of their territory, special customer equipment & pro install required, increased support headaches, increased more difficult maintenance, limited port availability, bandwidth hogs would be even more so ...
not to mention the fact that Embarq is very lacking on backhaul bandwidth.

I personally think what Embarq is attempting to do, as of now, is to light up as many RT's and CO's with DSL as quickly as possible so they can attain 100% coverage some time in late 2008-2009 (I'd think 2009). That way, they don't have to worry about "oh, this area can't get DSL" or "hey! No fair, we're the last town in Embarq territory to get DSL". Then, once that build-out is completely, hopefully they'll address their backhaul issue....if they don't...I don't see how they'll make it...
Forums » Embarq 10Mbps


Thursday, 10-Dec 00:36:52 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [109] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [66] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [61] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
Most people now reading
· ICC strats [World of Warcraft]
· Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.42.34 [Security]
· Hot Girl falls face first down stairs [56k Lookout (Broadband Heavy)]
· SB6120 Firmware update [Comcast HSI]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Official "Invite" thread Part 3 - ALL INVITES GO HERE ! [Filesharing Software]
· Battered Hilt Delimma [World of Warcraft]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]