<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>I would say no too in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19002404</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:03:17 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:03:17 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: I would say no too</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19004419</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : So you get tired of the small companies using the FCC to their advantage but don't mind it if AT&T or VZ does it?  Makes a whole lot of sense.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19004419</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:04:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>I would say no too</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19002404</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1465905"><b>Richard B</b></A> : Let face it this is a poor business model. You going to give away service and then charge ad revenue. I though this stupid business model that should had died with the Dot-Con bust. Oh wait there still You Tube. <br><br>What I am getting tired off is how big and small companies are trying to manipulate the FCC to their benefit. First there was Goggle trying to manipulate the Auction; now this crappy company. The only fair way to allocate the spectrum is unconditional Auction.   ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19002404</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:55:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
