http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19007627 en Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:20:20 EDT Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:20:20 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19007681 anon : I don't need all that stuff cluttering up my screen.

Look, I know people generate revenues from having ads on their site, it's the nature of the beast. But you can bet if I have any say about it, I'm going to go for the purest, cleanest surf I can find.

Firefox/NoScript/AdBlocker Plus = NICE]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19007681 Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:00:42 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19007672 richdelb : I agree. Browsing with ad blocker is much faster. Most of the slowness I ever see with web pages is from the ad servers. Things are much quicker now.

Plus... Just think of all the precious bandwidth we are saving......]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19007672 Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:48:49 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19007627 TKJunkMail : no wonder it is popular. Besides clearing a lot of useless junk off the screen, it saves the time needed to resolve the addresses and also download all the ads. This makes browsing with an ad blocker even faster.

Here are 2 examples of how effectively this type of product gets rid of ads:
[att=1]
[att=2]
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page

]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19007627 Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:40:58 EDT