Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Comcast BitTorrent Efforts Violating State Laws? » Comcrap
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Preserve the integrity of their network??? »
« I HATE Comcast.  
AuthorAll Replies

Kzbd

join:2006-10-01
Roselle, IL
reply to matrix3D
Re: Comcrap

YEAH REVOLUTION! Wait, you want to storm Comcast?

lesopp

join:2001-06-27
Land O Lakes, FL

reply to swhx7
I think there is an angle worth investigating.

Remember the FCC decision to label cable modem service as an information service instead of a telecom service in effect removing regulatory requirements.

I could be wrong but a big difference between the two is that bits change in a telecom service and they do not change in an information service. I could have this completely reversed but if not then comcast is operating a telecom service and should have to experience the full impact of each appropriate regulator entity.

matrix3D

join:2006-09-27
Deep River, CT

reply to swhx7
Unfortunately, in this country of ours ("The best in the world!") it is never justice or reason that wins in our courts -- it's who can spend the most money and drag it out the longest. How much longer do we have to let the rich get away with whatever they want before U.S. citizens will start the next revolution?


swhx7
Premium
join:2006-07-23
Elbonia
·RoadRunner Cable


1 edit
reply to ztmike
I agree they would win in court, but I think it is "defauding the customers" in some sense. If Comcast deliberately forges a packet, and the customer relies on that packet to be genuine, and suffers disadvantage because it's not, there are the legal elements are deception, intent to deceive, reliance, and harm. It's on such a micro-scale that it would never be placed under the same legal rule as selling bogus merchandise, but in principle it is odious.

To the editorialist above: Is it OK for an individual to go into a situation for some other purpose - say, into a business to install a router - and start falsifying traffic? Maybe it benefits some third party; does that make it OK? If not, then why is it OK for a corporation to do the same?

The larger issue is that if it comes to be considered acceptable for ISPs to falsify customers' internet traffic on a small scale, it opens the door to legalized DNS poisoning, stealth censorship of news reports, and other abuses.

Edited to clarify.
Forums » Comcast BitTorrent Efforts Violating State Laws?Preserve the integrity of their network??? »
« I HATE Comcast.  


Thursday, 10-Dec 23:09:37 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [138] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [87] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [75] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [57] Average American Consumes 34 Gigabytes Daily
· [56] AT&T: iPhone Data Pricing Comments 'Taken Out Of Context'
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
Most people now reading
· New Mediacom Email [Mediacom]
· [WIN7] Well, I was dumb, but do I have recourse? [Microsoft Help]
· ICC strats [World of Warcraft]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· ICC Strats??? [World of Warcraft]
· malware has been found hidden inside an Ubuntu screensaver [Security]
· Snow on Roof [Home Repair & Improvement]