 halfbandPremium join:2002-06-01 Huntsville, AL Reviews:
·Comcast
4 edits | Be carefull what you wish for - So comcast stops throttling BT. - BT usage starts to clog up the upload link on comcasts network. - Users complain that the entire comcast network is too slow and demand that they "fix" it. - Comcast increases the bandwidth of the network so BT and all the applications that BT was slowing down will work and passes along the $10 per month upgrade to us. - Users complain about the price increase because it is supporting a small number of users and the "I don't use BT so I shouldn't have to pay for it" crowd demands that comcast enforce the TOS and stop all BT so the price can go back down. .... -- Registered Bandwidth Offender #40812 |
|
 axus join:2001-06-18 Washington, DC Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
| And those customers switch to slower DSL which is cheaper, right? No legal reason for Comcast couldn't write a data transfer cap into all contracts going forward. But people WANT unlimited service, I don't most people are going to switch to a service that isn't net-neutral. |
|
 | reply to halfband said by halfband:- So comcast stops throttling BT. - BT usage starts to clog up the upload link on comcasts network. - Users complain that the entire comcast network is too slow and demand that they "fix" it. - Comcast increases the bandwidth of the network so BT and all the applications that BT was slowing down will work and passes along the $10 per month upgrade to us. - Users complain about the price increase because it is supporting a small number of users and the "I don't use BT so I shouldn't have to pay for it" crowd demands that comcast enforce the TOS and stop all BT so the price can go back down. .... Then they should deal with the bandwidth hogs directly. I use less than 25g a month. I would consider myself a light user; so why should my usage of bit torrent be limited? The problem is Comcast is throwing out the baby with the bath water. What will they do tomorrow when they decide Yotube or some other application is responsible for a sizable portion of their bandwidth usage. Are they going to interfere with those applications too. Comcast customers are finding new ways to use their bandwidth, but Comcast is not growing with the growing needs of their customers. |
|
|
|
 | reply to halfband Oh please - if Comcrap was that close to having a problem maintaining banwidth on their network - that if all it's users consistantly used the top speed of WHAT THEY ARE PAYING COMCRAP FOR in a sustained manner, Comcast wouldn't be able to handle the traffic - resulting in some kind of digital log-jam, then why in the hell are they selling people higher tiers and powerboost - which can almost quadruple your speeds??? They are either stupid or dishonest! If they are telling customers that they are paying for 8mbps service, then that's what they should get - and they cannot use "illegal usage" as a reason to throttle unless they can positively tell that there is such illegal use. They cannot tell simply by the amount of up/downloading - or because it's a P2P network - the only way to be 100% sure is to intercept and analyze the download. Since that is invasion of privacy WHICH IS ILLEGAL, then it stands to reason that Comcast has no legal recourse for restricting a users activities in regards to what they are up/downloading. Therefore a TOS statement is unenforceable.
If Comcrap followed you example, and opened up it's bandwidth, you know what that would be? COMCAST DOING WHAT IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE DOING! And as far as the sudden increase of traffic "slowing down the net" - that's a load of crap. America's internet is so throttled , controlled and artificially slowed-down (we can't "afford" or will not pay what they want to offer us unfettered speeds... it's all part of the "plan" to keep it at a certain pace because we will pay more later...) that "opening up the bandwidth" might not get good headlines for all the fake complaints from Comcrap and other rip-off artists - but technically will actually help the internet to run better.
Japan has speeds of over 30mbps - I frequent some of their forums as well... I rarely hear them complaining about "bandwidth" issues - which from the very start wasn't really a physical value anyway - it's an arbitrary unit used to give companies like Comcrap a tangible reason to charge you! That's why the only time you hear about them spending a lot of money is when they are expanding lines or upgradeing equipment.
Bandwidth is the biggest con ever created - once you are connected it really costs next to nothing as the signal is just an electronic stream... and with broadband your "electronic stream" is always connected... But people have allowed themselves to be conned into NOT thinking about it. It cost more to throttle than it does to let it flow - but then, if you want to have a reason to continually raise prices - of course your going to portion it out,, raising the price each time you open the hose a bit.
All of your points sound like the brainwashed babble that Comcrap infuses and even spouts itself in defense of it's practices. Even if it were true - there are simply not enough people on BT or all of the P2P networks to "clog up the network" anyway, regardless if they were downloading at full powerboost speeds. And Comcrap is going to raise your fees regardless - might as well get something out of it - like the ability to actually USE the speed you paid them for... consistantly... at a sustained rate... |
|