<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014184</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:00:21 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:00:21 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19022532</link>
<description><![CDATA[bogey780 posted : All calculated into the formula they use to "cherry pick".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19022532</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:07:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19020510</link>
<description><![CDATA[El Gaupo posted : Agreed,I work for ATT and you should see some of the aera's getting wired.As matter of fact I bet one in three homes actually has a auto that works]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19020510</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 06:42:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19017071</link>
<description><![CDATA[en102 posted : I agree... a there's 2 VRADs attached to my HOA (420 homes).<br>There's 1 VRAD in Newhall mobile home park, and covers the adjacent homes as well.  The density is at least ~ 2:1 for mobile homes vs. houses here.<br><br>This is one of the reasons Verizon likes the highly populated eastern corridor (NYC/MA/CT/VA/DE, etc.) vs. the lower density states that AT&T has IL, MI, TX, CA, NV, IN, OH, TN, KY, etc.)<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19017071</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:16:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19017012</link>
<description><![CDATA[BF69 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/974197" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=974197');">bogey780</a>:</small><br><br>People mistake the issues. ATT determines the relative cost to install the service in a location. Then they guess the estimated numbers of customers. Now this may suprise people but the number of customers you get in most neighborhoods isn't altogether that different. "Rich" neighborhoods just tend to be newer houses and have newer easier to upgrade lines or had new plant set to facilitate the demand for luxury regulated items like ISDN, T1, and multiple phone lines.<br> </div>These same new neighborhoods tend to have larger properties thus there are LESS potential customers. Just because someone is a millonaire doesn't mean they are going to drop what they have now for at&t. In fact it's much more likely that a "poorer" neighborhood would since they would be more apt to want to save every penny they can. And of course "poorer" neighrborhoods have smaller properties so ther are more residences per square mile, acre or however you want to measure it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19017012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:07:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19015531</link>
<description><![CDATA[KrK posted : Catch is, it has to be a lie.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19015531</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:47:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19015453</link>
<description><![CDATA[supertech315 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/625141" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=625141');">pnh102</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/568336" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=568336');">morbo</a>:</small><br><br>unless you are one of those "country folk should move to da city if 'n deys wants telephony!" <br></div>I am one of those people.<br> </div>LOL]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19015453</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:36:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014963</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anonymous_ posted : This area is getting it <br><br>Might As well KEEP  TWC HSI/VOICE it DIRT cheap 79$<br><br> i get<br><br>10/1<br>and 6/512 too<br>Volce Over cable]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014963</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:17:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014945</link>
<description><![CDATA[bogey780 posted : People mistake the issues. ATT determines the relative cost to install the service in a location. Then they guess the estimated numbers of customers. Now this may suprise people but the number of customers you get in most neighborhoods isn't altogether that different. "Rich" neighborhoods just tend to be newer houses and have newer easier to upgrade lines or had new plant set to facilitate the demand for luxury regulated items like ISDN, T1, and multiple phone lines.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014945</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:13:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014689</link>
<description><![CDATA[en102 posted : I agree... the Santa Clarita (Newhall) mobile home park had Uverse before they even started working on the site for Uverse in my area.<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014689</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:22:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014604</link>
<description><![CDATA[Scatcatpdx posted : &#147;If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."<br><br>Joseph Goebbels<br> How many times we heard about cherry picking. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014604</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:07:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014599</link>
<description><![CDATA[morbo posted : you are ridiculous. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014599</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:06:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014571</link>
<description><![CDATA[pnh102 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/568336" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=568336');">morbo</a>:</small><br><br>unless you are one of those "country folk should move to da city if 'n deys wants telephony!" <br></div>I am one of those people.<br><small>--<br>Only SHATNER is Kirk.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014571</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:01:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014528</link>
<description><![CDATA[morbo posted : if cherry picking was a GOOD thing, everyone outside of dense cities would have no phone service.  so maybe you should qualify your statements...unless you are one of those "country folk should move to da city if 'n deys wants telephony!"]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014528</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:54:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014450</link>
<description><![CDATA[BF69 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/594412" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=594412');">ThrowDemsOut</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote">AT&T picks the most profitable neighborhoods for deployment</div>Nice statement. But there is no proof offered or available that this is the case. And constant repetition doesn't make it true.<br> </div>Ok saying "AT&T picks the most profitable neighborhoods for deployment." Doesn't mean they are deploying in the RICHEST neighborhoods.<br><br>Take 2 areas, one has millionaires and has 200 residences, the other is a middle class area same size but has 3000. Which area is going to be "most profitable" for at&t? It's not the "rich" area.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014450</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:39:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014393</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cabal posted : Shame on them for not picking the unprofitable neighborhoods for deployment! :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014393</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:26:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014283</link>
<description><![CDATA[pnh102 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/594412" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=594412');">ThrowDemsOut</a>:</small><br><br>Nice statement. But there is no proof offered or available that this is the case. And constant repetition doesn't make it true. </div>I think it is a mistake to try to refute this claim.  Refuting it makes it sound like cherry-picking is a bad thing, which it isn't.<br><br>Companies don't have to apologize for avoiding activities which are eventual money pits.<br><small>--<br>Only SHATNER is Kirk.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014283</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:03:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014235</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cod posted : Even if it is/was true, god forbid a company trying to obtain a ROI for initial buildouts... I don't see any laws being broken.  Its called business.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014235</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:53:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>No proof AT&#x26;T only picks rich neighborhoods</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014184</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote">AT&T picks the most profitable neighborhoods for deployment</div>Nice statement. But there is no proof offered or available that this is the case. And constant repetition doesn't make it true.<br><small>--<br>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb">Internet News</a><br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h">My BLOG</a><br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto">My Web Page</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/No-proof-ATT-only-picks-rich-neighborhoods-19014184</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:45:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

