<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Consumers&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19022944</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:04:53 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:04:53 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Consumers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19028384</link>
<description><![CDATA[Thaler posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1294421" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1294421');">roc5955</a>:</small><br><br>If you don't like the way things are, YOU are responsible for changing things, and YOU have the power of the vote to do so.</div>Well, barring a people's revolution on capital hill, I still think you miss the point. Blaming the head moron for actions incited even outside his own party just shows that defending corporate interests isn't a party/administration-line issue.<br><br>All I'm saying is that flushing away our digital rights has never been a soley Bush venture. The trend started long ago...its just the current congress and administration combined have been making heaps of ground in the matter.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19028384</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:17:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Consumers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19027425</link>
<description><![CDATA[roc5955 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/945359" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=945359');">Thaler</a>:</small><br><br>Having a changing of the head guard won't do much of squat when both sides of the political equasion are already bought & paid for.<br> </div>Well you can always get out and vote the ones who are 'bought and paid for' out, now can't you?<br><br>If you don't like the way things are, YOU are responsible for changing things, and YOU have the power of the vote to do so.<br><small>--<br>"Understanding is a three-edged sword."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19027425</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 07:03:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Consumers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19027233</link>
<description><![CDATA[Thaler posted : I really, really, really doubt that the torpedoing of network neutrality wouldn't have gotten to where it is today without bipartisan-ly greased wheels. I mean, do you remember the DMCA sellout that was completed while Clinton was at the wheel? Having a changing of the head guard won't do much of squat when both sides of the political equasion are already bought & paid for.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19027233</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:04:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Consumers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19027202</link>
<description><![CDATA[KrK posted : D.O.J. ...<br><br>Department of Jesters?  Are they serious?  Someone looking for some lobbyist $$$.  Get back to work.  The F.C.C. is already screwing this up enough without the DOJ's help.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19027202</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:43:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Consumers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19023188</link>
<description><![CDATA[roc5955 posted : I agree it's about the money, but the current <strike>morons</strike> administration, is surely in favor of it, as some sort of payback, no doubt.  Don't forget, Gonzo isn't out the door quite yet.  I think he leaves on the 17th.<br><br>I am sure that there are some Dems who are all about the money as well.  Just as I am sure that there are more than a majority of legislators who haven't a clue as to WTF these "internets" are.<br><small>--<br>"Understanding is a three-edged sword."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19023188</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:40:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Consumers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19023156</link>
<description><![CDATA[woody7 posted : It's not just "this" administration, there are a lot of Dems backing this also, and for full disclosure, I am a Dem. Remember, it's all about the money, everything else is secondary. Peace :D :D :D<br><small>--<br>BlooMe</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19023156</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:36:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Consumers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19023113</link>
<description><![CDATA[sholling posted : I wonder how many "consulting" gigs that piece of propaganda is costing the incumbents. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19023113</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:31:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Consumers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19023067</link>
<description><![CDATA[roc5955 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/957524" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=957524');">jgkolt</a>:</small><br><br>so this would hamper the small company s from competing against the large business effectively thwarting competition resulting in more of a monopoly style competition.<br> </div>WTF do you expect from this administration?  Do you think they would actually stand up for WE THE PEOPLE, or the corporations?<br><br>Something tells me that the DOJ of Bushco, Inc. is going to favor big business EVERY FRIGGIN' TIME!<br><br><small>--<br>"Understanding is a three-edged sword."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19023067</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:24:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Consumers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19022968</link>
<description><![CDATA[jgkolt posted : so this would hamper the small company s from competing against the large business effectively thwarting competition resulting in more of a monopoly style competition.<br><br>also seen here<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/techpolicy/2007-09-06-priority-web-traffic-charge_N.htm" >www.usatoday.com/tech/news/techp&middot;&middot;&middot;ge_N.htm</A><br><br><small>--<br>www.LakeSemaJ.com<br>Help me get free trades.3 free if you sign up, $7 after. PM Me</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Consumers-19022968</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:11:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Consumers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Consumers-19022944</link>
<description><![CDATA[MrMoody posted : Who else do they think is going to pay? Wake up and smell reality.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Consumers-19022944</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:07:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

