<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>That is some heavy reading in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19027931</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:40:41 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:40:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>That is some heavy reading</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19027931</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/466028"><b>RayW</b></A> : and I like the high flautin language such as <i>"will cause unintentional RF emissions which may adversely affect the established radio noise floor directly, or by cumulative propagation from many such sources." </i>  Gee...how many anti-BPL people here have been saying that without have to spend a lot of money on a study?  <br><br>But try and read the report, there is a lot of information, and I think some workarounds.<br><br>And yes, we know that some people here do not care about users of the RF spectrum, just as long as they *might* have another source of internet access.<br><small>--<br>I am not lost, I find myself every time.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19027931</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 09:55:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
