republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

jsouth
Jsouth

join:2000-12-12
Wichita, KS

reply to Rob

Re: Thanks Comcast!

The thank you for not making the caps known is dumb. Comcast should make the caps known. If Comcast says the caps are 50gigs a month and people stay under them, wouldn't that also stop bandwidth abusers?
--
Bush bashing is old. How about more solutions instead?


Rob
In Deo speramus, God Bless the USA
Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
kudos:2

said by jsouth:

The thank you for not making the caps known is dumb. Comcast should make the caps known. If Comcast says the caps are 50gigs a month and people stay under them, wouldn't that also stop bandwidth abusers?
Then it's an inconvenience to the other 99% of their customers that aren't consuming 200GB/mo.

So again, THANK YOU Comcast.

n0ym

join:2004-12-21
Rockville, MD

Then it's an inconvenience to the other 99% of their customers that aren't consuming 200GB/mo.

So again, THANK YOU Comcast.
With that level of certainty, it should be easy for you to back up your assertions that stated caps would encourage additional bandwidth usage over the current situation, in which many (most?) people seem to think the bandwidth is unlimited.

Please feel free to do so. And if you can't, we'll know where things stand.

n0ym

join:2004-12-21
Rockville, MD

reply to jsouth

The thank you for not making the caps known is dumb.
Yeah, it is.

The simple fact is, it's quite likely those who will use high-bandwidth applications will use them, and those who have no interest in them are not likely to discover such interest when caps are stated.

By stating caps, Comcast could 1) decrease bad publicity and 2) decrease excessive usage. But by doing so, they'd dispel the myth (which, of course, they had no part in starting), that their service is unlimited.

I think there are a number of vocal people here who either work for Comcast or enjoy other people's problems, and simply won't acknowledge that explicitly stating caps and limitations on service (instead of vague legalese buried in terms and conditions) is a fair business practice.

Tuesday, 29-May 04:17:21 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics