Re: there is a much easier way to do this in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19053158 en Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:25:04 EDT Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:25:04 EDT Re: there is a much easier way to do this http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19078101 anon : The Top Global MB6800 has a 1 x 4 switch built in. Their latest firmware support auto-failover between WAN and WWAN. An advanced version called the MB6800P can do load balance. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19078101 Sat, 15 Sep 2007 01:16:59 EDT Re: there is a much easier way to do this http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19053876 sporkme :
said by dcdeadbeat :

Why didn't you just use a SonicWall TZ190 router with built in WWAN and multiple WAN load-balancing.
You're missing the point. The SonicWall can't selectively send traffic out different interfaces like this guy requires. He wants traffic that requires low-latency and little bandwidth to go over the EDGE connection and bulk delay-insensitive traffic to go over the satellite. The SonicWall can't do this, nor can it be modified to do it.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19053876 Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:50:12 EDT Re: there is a much easier way to do this http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19053278 fcisler : I'd really have to suggest you go see what pfSense is before calling it "jerry-rigged":

»www.pfsense.com/index.php?id=27

Check out some of the screenshots there]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19053278 Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:09:03 EDT Re: there is a much easier way to do this http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19053201 jdjbuffalo : I agree using a dual WAN router is the way to go if you want an easier solution than this guy jerry-rigged.

However, I have to disagree with your recommendation to use a Sonicwall product. From personal experience configuring several, I have to say they are a POS. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19053201 Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:53:09 EDT Re: there is a much easier way to do this http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19053158 fcisler :
said by dcdeadbeat :

Why didn't you just use a SonicWall TZ190 router with built in WWAN and multiple WAN load-balancing.

It does what you want automatically.

Silly people trying to make life difficult.
Possibly because pfSense is free and has many, many more features than SonicWall can offer?

Can the sonicwall route based upon destination IP/Port?

Making life difficult? No

Saving money? Yes

And Are you F'ing nuts? $630 and up?!?!?! Yeah...where a WRAP (looks like what he has) is about $175 MAX (no longer being made) or a Soekris is $150 - $250?

Yes...I think he is trying to make it "harder" :(]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19053158 Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:43:59 EDT there is a much easier way to do this http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19052804 anon : Why didn't you just use a SonicWall TZ190 router with built in WWAN and multiple WAN load-balancing.

It does what you want automatically.

Silly people trying to make life difficult.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19052804 Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:53:43 EDT