<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: wow&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wow-19053084</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:45:08 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:45:08 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wow-19053203</link>
<description><![CDATA[hitman_001 posted : in 90% of the cases if a person could get EVDO they wouldnt need the satellite. If you are a freak about download speeds, some areas are more congested on EVDO and offer less bandwidth. However if you live out in unserved areas.. your really not used to getting much of that to begin with. So having the two would be pointless, because you'd have your speed and your much lower latency all in one, and still cut your internet bill in half.<br><small>--<br>Hn7000s Small Office plan/.74m dish & 1Watt Trans on Satmex 5 Signal: 86/Win XP Pro SP2/P4 3gig, 2Gigs Ram, Radeon X1300 500meg video</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wow-19053203</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:54:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/wow-19053084</link>
<description><![CDATA[jgkolt posted : I will say this guy is truly resourceful. Now he needs to get evdo rev A and see how his speeds are. THis is assuming he gets coverage out there.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/wow-19053084</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:31:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
