boggaf05CCNA, SCVUPremium
join:2006-06-21
Gaffney, SC | OTA I think more people will go back to OTA once they figure out its still free and the picture quality is better than cable or satellites HD because they have to recompress their signals for retransmission. Also cable or satellite cannot keep up with the changes in sub-channels when the local stations change them, for instance during march madness our local CBS station added 2 more sub-channels to carry 2 additional games, the local cable operator did not add the sub-channels. but if you are talking about discovery HD or something else that is a different story, but until more cable channels go to HD it is not worth the extra monthly fee. |
|
 BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | said by boggaf05:I think more people will go back to OTA once they figure out its still free and the picture quality is better than cable or satellites HD because they have to recompress their signals for retransmission. So I will be able to get ESPN, Discovery Channel, Food Network, History Channel etc etc over OTA then? Um no I think not. |
|
| said by BF69:said by boggaf05:I think more people will go back to OTA once they figure out its still free and the picture quality is better than cable or satellites HD because they have to recompress their signals for retransmission. So I will be able to get ESPN, Discovery Channel, Food Network, History Channel etc etc over OTA then? Um no I think not. The Food Channel is hilarious. Gee, those women look like the just had the best orgasm over discovering a new pasta dish.
--
Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.
-Supergirl |
|
boggaf05CCNA, SCVUPremium
join:2006-06-21
Gaffney, SC | reply to boggaf05
said by boggaf05: but if you are talking about discovery HD or something else that is a different story, but until more cable channels go to HD it is not worth the extra monthly fee. |
|
