site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
82
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

sirghost
citywide

join:2005-07-23
Phoenix, AZ

its all about choice

My two cents is, Id rather have choices, rather then limitations. Alacarte limits me to what my choices are because channels that are not super popular would die off, thus, giving me LESS choices.


BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

said by sirghost:

My two cents is, Id rather have choices, rather then limitations. Alacarte limits me to what my choices are because channels that are not super popular would die off, thus, giving me LESS choices.
Not true.

First of all why do people think it's going to be either or? Where do you read that if ala carte is made mandatory that that will be the ONLY choice? The fact is the the VAST majority of customers will continue with the service they have currently. Those that want ala carte will get their choice? How is this bad? I would be seriously surprised if more than 15% of cable customers at any one time would be taking advantage of ala carte.

I also doubt that it will be true ala carte so if you want say 13 channels then you can get 13 channels. There will probably be tiers like 10 channels for X amount 20 channels for X amount etc etc.

Tuesday, 29-May 10:03:23 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics