imanogre
join:2005-11-29
Mcdonough, GA
| reply to Chuckles
Re: Really bad.
said by Chuckles  :I'm sorry you read "you" as consumers and not sharksfan3. Actually he said, "They could of course provide content worth watching." So even if you did mean sharksfan3, how in the world did you infer that sharskfan3 even suggested that should be the one whom decides what's worth watching. He's just simply suggesting that some stations have no consumers, or not enough to sustain their programming lineup.
No offense, and Perhaps I'm wrong, but I can't help but think that you are trying to put an anti Free Market spin on this. |
|
Chuckles
Premium
join:2006-03-04
Saint Paul, MN
1 edit | reply to BIGHUSKER
I'm sorry you read "you" as consumers and not sharksfan3.
Actually he said, "They could of course provide content worth watching." |
|
BIGHUSKER
join:2002-01-20
Minneapolis, MN
1 edit | reply to james
I'd have to agree that Chuckles posted an amazingly stupid question. Yes, consumers *should* be the ones who decide what's worth watching. What is wrong with you? |
|
