
how-to block ads
|
|
Uniqs: 139 |
Share Topic  |
 |
|
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
1 edit | By the byte--- HELL NO (And here's why) Because I'm a download hog?
Not even close.
I'm opposed to by-the-byte billing because 1) It WILL be priced to cost everyone more... and ...
2) Because people force you to burn bandwidth on crap you don't want. Think how much things like SPAM, Ads, popups, redirects etc... if all that crap was on your dime, I think I'd get really pissed off.
Being forced to pay while someone spoonfeeds you flashy ads you don't want just because you do want to access some page or webserver--- no thanks.
There's another reason. It would damage online updating and bugfixing. Think about it. Microsoft issues one of their big patches. You download it. Microsoft's bugs just cost you money out of your pocket. Maybe you wouldn't care, but I KNOW there would be people out there filing lawsuits.
Plus all this crap of apps phoning home and verifying and checking and updating... all on your dime. THANKS, but NO THANKS. | | |
|  bencPremium join:2007-06-17 Glen Carbon, IL Reviews:
·Charter
| I made an earlier post saying that I don't like the idea of paying by usage, at least with respect to the Internet.
You bring up an important point, one that I didn't think of.
I know that I would personally be upset by having to pay even more for pop-ups, SPAM, and Microsoft's (and other company's) mistakes.
I also thought of another thing: What if some mal-ware infects your computer, and uses a bunch of data transfer. That could be an enormous bill, through no fault of your own.
To compare it to something else, consider pager messages, or SMS. Most carriers charge money to receive them, as well as send them. It's also possible send them via E-mail or through websites. Can you see the abuse potential? If you can't, consider it's possible to write a script that sends automated E-mails.
What if a theoretical script was written that sent 100 messages a day? That's roughly 3,000 messages a month. At $.10/msg., that's $300 more that month.
To solve this problem, just use text-message block.
I use this example because it's a case where it's pay-by-use and you have no control. You can't decide to receive some messages and not others, although you can comprehensively block all messages.
One poster who replied to my original message stated that the other things people use are on a pay-by-use basis, and no one has complained. Well, his examples were all things where you have absolute control. Electricity and phone calls were a couple examples that poster cited. But unlike SMS and Internet, you have absolute control over whether a light is turned on, or whether you make that phone call. | |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| Exactly.
I also posted another situation: Malware botnets scanning your IP range. Now, let's say you were patched and firewalled, so your PC was safe. Great....but on pay per byte model, you'd still be billed for the bandwidth used by all the infected machines scanning your range trying to infect you. -- "Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) | |  jaaPremium,MVM join:2000-06-13 kudos:2 Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Vonage
| reply to KrK said by KrK:I'm opposed to by-the-byte billing because 1) It WILL be priced to cost everyone more... Internet is priced according to what the market will bear, just like any product, and will continue to do so. If they can charge more (metered or unmetered), they will. -- NOTHING justifies terrorism. We don't negotiate with terrorists. Those that support terrorists are terrorists. | |  jaaPremium,MVM join:2000-06-13 kudos:2 Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Vonage
| reply to benc said by benc:I also thought of another thing: What if some mal-ware infects your computer, and uses a bunch of data transfer. That could be an enormous bill, through no fault of your own. Whose fault would it be? Perhaps people would be more careful if there were a financial downside for them. The owner of the PC is in the best position to prevent, detect, and fix such problems. Would you rather the ISP suspend account they suspect of malware? | |
|