site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
113
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


viperpa33s
Why Me?
Premium
join:2002-12-20
Bradenton, FL

Might as well just go back to dial up

Billing by the byte would not be a good idea cause having the internet would be to expensive to use for a lot of people. To expensive even for the people who only use the internet just for web browsing and emails.

Video streaming, sending home movies, , video downloading, sending pictures, playing online games will be all to expensive to do if you bill by the byte. I am sure no one will want a $300 - $500 internet bill.

My position always has been the government should not get into the internet business. With crazy ideas like this, it makes me kind of wonder if that position is outdated. Might as well go back to dial up, at least you didn't have any of these issues.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

said by viperpa33s:

Billing by the byte would not be a good idea cause having the internet would be to expensive to use for a lot of people. To expensive even for the people who only use the internet just for web browsing and emails.
You mean too expensive like other metered services such as electricity, oil, gas, water, cell phone, etc.?
said by viperpa33s:

Video streaming, sending home movies, , video downloading, sending pictures, playing online games will be all to expensive to do if you bill by the byte. I am sure no one will want a $300 - $500 internet bill.
Unless the ISPs want to go broke from the attrition of customers, I seriously doubt the normal user doing the things that you referenced will ever see a bill anywhere close to $300.

Eke, the sky is falling.

Tuesday, 29-May 01:02:41 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics