 wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace join:2004-08-07 New York, NY | reply to Warez_Zealot
Re: Perhaps if they offered a two tiered model..... said by Warez_Zealot:Only something like metered internet could happen in a backwards country like the USA. Yeah, clearly you have never heard of such backwards countries as the UK, New Zeland, Argentina, and countless others who have been charging metered rates for years now. Ahh yes, idiocy at its best folks! -- я люблю Денди! |
|
 Warez_ZealotRural land of the rising sun join:2006-04-19 japan | Well they are secluded countries w/ relatively low populations where most of their fibre is run underwater.. What's the USA's excuse? |
|
|
|
 openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 | What does that have to do with your comment about backwards countries and metered Internet access? |
|
 wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace join:2004-08-07 New York, NY | reply to Warez_Zealot said by Warez_Zealot:Well they are secluded countries w/ relatively low populations where most of their fibre is run underwater.. What's the USA's excuse? The UK is a secluded country with a low population??? Thanks for the laughs this evening, and dont let me stop you from digging yourself further into that hole! -- я люблю Денди! |
|
 Warez_ZealotRural land of the rising sun join:2006-04-19 japan 1 edit | Uh, yeah digging a hole? How many ISP's even have metered inet in Britain? I'm sure they aren't really any ISP's charging by the byte in London, Glasgow, or the other larger cities. I unless they have a ISP monopoly where you have the choice between cable, 1 telco, and a few resellers..
I heard that NZ, AU, and Argentina do, but that's because they are cut off from society, and the cost of running fibre cost a lot, so they charge up the ass to avoid upgrading.
Charging by the byte is going to halt the evolution of the internet in USA, Canada, not develope it quicker. |
|
 redshiftPremium join:2004-03-23 Beverly Hills, CA | NZ and Au do charge by the gigabyte, but they have capped plans as well, just not that same as the North American ones. What they do over there is slow your internet down when you exceed your data limit for the month.
Bandwidth costs in Au/NZ are nearly 100X more than what you would pay for it in the US, primarily because of the fact that most of the bandwidth is controlled by a monopoly, or duopoly, and of course the bulk of the data is overseas, and therefore run through expensive underwater fiber/fibre.
That being said though they have access to pretty innovative technology such as ADSL2+/Annex M and most people can get 8Mbps dsl even in rural areas. So it doesn't necessarily halt innovation, but can actually drive it.
Compare that to say a place like the GTA in Canada. You'd be lucky if you could even get 5mbps DSL, with most people syncing at 3mbps...if lucky. And don't even start about the oversold Cable (Rogers) where they throttle everything including torrents,voip, so the extra "bandwidth" is a mute point. Of course they also have invisible caps, which Bell Sympatico also now openly admits (check out their plans). Also no residential FTTH providers like Verizon, so in that respect the US isn't that backwards. |
|
 wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace join:2004-08-07 New York, NY | reply to Warez_Zealot said by Warez_Zealot:I'm sure they aren't really any ISP's charging by the byte in London, Glasgow, or the other larger cities. Yawn. That hole must be so deep by now that you will have a hard time getting out. I think now would be a good time for you to (un)gracefully bow out of this argument.
PlusNet »www.plus.net/?home=hometop
Bulldog »www.bulldogbroadband.com/index3.asp -- я люблю Денди! |
|
 Warez_ZealotRural land of the rising sun join:2006-04-19 japan | Wow, keep trying. The fact is, there is a generation of people from 14-25 who would never go on metered broadband knowing it's a scam unless it was their only option.
If you can't see that, I feel sorry for you.
P.S Are those the only 2 ISP's in all of Britain? lol... I'm sure their clients are the equivalent to that USA AOL subscribers.. |
|
 wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace join:2004-08-07 New York, NY | said by Warez_Zealot:Wow, keep trying. The fact is, there is a generation of people from 14-25 who would never go on metered broadband knowing it's a scam unless it was their only option. Quick demographic less here pal, most people in that age group aren't buying/paying for their own broadband due to the fact that they live at home. You must be getting close to China now, so keep on digging...... -- я люблю Денди! |
|
 Warez_ZealotRural land of the rising sun join:2006-04-19 japan | Your not making any sense. Sure they may or may not be paying for inet now -- which is un-metered (by that I mean no surplus fees). One day those kids will eventually move out, and will not buy metered internet where you pay by the bite.
Either you are in China (where generations of families live together) or maybe you have nice parents who will let you live at home for the rest of your their life. If that's the case great for you. Just run up that pay by the bit internet cause they pay for it; but where I come from 99% of most parents kick their kids out by the time they hit 18 -19 let alone 25... |
|
 wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace join:2004-08-07 New York, NY | said by Warez_Zealot:Your not making any sense. Sure they may or may not be paying for inet now -- which is un-metered (by that I mean no surplus fees). One day those kids will eventually move out, and will not buy metered internet where you pay by the bite. Again, you still dont seem to get a very simple concept and your comments only confirm this. Assuming people are "kicked out of the house" at 18 as you suggest, they are most likely going to be watching every penny. If those same people are given the chance to pay $20 (for example) for a metered internet plan, then they are going to chose that over a $60 "flat rate" plan. Given that it has been proven time and time again that most people dont use egregious amounts of bandwidth, a cheaper alternative (metered rate) would be a boon for millions of people in this country. -- я люблю Денди! |
|
 PiggieI Actually use WindstreamPremium join:2005-11-23 Orange Springs, FL | 90% of the problem didn't even start until the cable dsl bandwidth wars. Who can bring the most to your door for the least.
If cable and dsl companies would sell reasonable packages, at a price they need to charge, this would mostly end. If 512 would be in the $20 range, to replace dial up. $30 to $35 for 1.5 and in the $60 range for 3m. This would solve a lot of problems. If 99% of their customers are not bandwidth hogs, they could live easy on the lower speeds.
I have throttled my router to 512 to see what it would be like, and one can surf very comfortable. Just some longer movies on news sites and Utube take longer.
The bandwidth war was a dumb idea and now it's back to bite the consumer. Sad :@( -- | Speedstream 4200 Modem - 3m/384 plan | W98-W2KSP4-XPSP2 - All AMD | Buffalo WHR G54S with OpenWRT WR0.9 | 2 downstream switches feeding 5 total clients (no wireless) | Including the Data port on the side of my neck | |
|