site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
192
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

MASantangelo
Premium
join:2004-07-19
Pittstown, NJ

Silly System

"Top" ISPs. My butt. The "top" ISPs should be a rating mix based on: Speed, Limitations on Service (caps, closed ports, etc), and Customer Service. NOT # Subscribers, because in some regions they may be the only viable choice.
--
Don't Let Them Take Your Rights!


LeftOfSanity
People Suck.

join:2005-11-06
Felton, DE

said by MASantangelo:

"Top" ISPs. My butt. The "top" ISPs should be a rating mix based on: Speed, Limitations on Service (caps, closed ports, etc), and Customer Service. NOT # Subscribers, because in some regions they may be the only viable choice.
Well get started on that. Ill log off and wait for your reply.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

reply to MASantangelo
Considering the point of the article was to rate the ISP by their size (i.e. number of subscribers), I believe it was on target. What you are asking for is more than likely related to customer satisfaction...which there have been several articles ranking the ISPs in this realm as well.


Tuesday, 29-May 06:18:48 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics