 RickPremium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT
1 edit | Umm..somebody better tell whomever wrote that list that SBC is now AT&T. lol. what isp planet have they been living on?
As for SBC..AT&T..Grandma bell..whatever you want to call them..I can't help but to think it's a pretty telling sign that out of their 17.3 Million broadband subs..only 100,000k are uverse subs and it's taken them a YEAR to get to even that number.
Phew..their new CEO better start looking for a new line of work me thinks.
Or, better yet..do as RR..err..Comcast Rick suggests...
and announce that Uverse..is DEAD..and AT&T FTTH..is ALIVE!
Let's do it today AT&T..OK? |
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2 | What does the breakdown of what service customers are using have to do with rankings based on the total number of customers served? Beyond the fact that you will pick an argument about Uverse any chance you get. You aren't an AT&T customers so why do you care so much? |
|
 en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | said by openbox9:Beyond the fact that you will pick an argument about Uverse any chance you get. You aren't an AT&T customers so why do you care so much? I'm not sure either. I'll be willing to give it a shot once my DirecTv and DSL-Extreme DSL contract is up, assuming that the price is better for me.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
Sammer
join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA | reply to Rick
Uverse won't die completely. Even when AT&T moves to FTTH (what year?) there will still be buildings like some MDUs where fiber won't reach every unit. |
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2 | reply to en102
I'm willing to give it a shot when they start deploying in Bellsouth regions. |
|
