<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Better then nothing and potentially cheaper&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Better-then-nothing-and-potentially-cheaper-19089936</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:04:03 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:04:03 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Better then nothing and potentially cheaper</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Better-then-nothing-and-potentially-cheaper-19090217</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : This would be great.  I live in the South and we are just outside of DSL range and our local cable company (Charter) doesn't provide internet service to the area yet.  I'm not sure they ever will, as it is "planned" but keeps getting "delayed" and has been for over 2 years now.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Better-then-nothing-and-potentially-cheaper-19090217</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:04:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Better then nothing and potentially cheaper</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Better-then-nothing-and-potentially-cheaper-19089936</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jonbo298 posted : Deploying WiMax to an area would seemingly be cheaper in the long run. You only maintain the towers rather then trying to maintain all phone lines still and deploying DSL capabilities.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Better-then-nothing-and-potentially-cheaper-19089936</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:17:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
