<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Better then nothing and potentially cheaper in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19090217</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:33:34 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:33:34 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Better then nothing and potentially cheaper</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19090217</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : This would be great.  I live in the South and we are just outside of DSL range and our local cable company (Charter) doesn't provide internet service to the area yet.  I'm not sure they ever will, as it is "planned" but keeps getting "delayed" and has been for over 2 years now.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19090217</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:04:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Better then nothing and potentially cheaper</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19089936</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/930918"><b>Jonbo298</b></A> : Deploying WiMax to an area would seemingly be cheaper in the long run. You only maintain the towers rather then trying to maintain all phone lines still and deploying DSL capabilities.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19089936</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:17:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
