<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: not docsis 3.0 in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19093349</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:26:25 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:26:25 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: not docsis 3.0</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19093349</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/957524"><b>jgkolt</b></A> : not suprising. oversell the download and ignore the upload.  but then they would have to deal with illegal file sharing taking up more bandwidth. hmm  it would still be nice to have faster upload.  you can get a faster upload in the states.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19093349</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:59:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>not docsis 3.0</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19093322</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/995903"><b>tmc8080</b></A> : more like doctheupload 48.5mbit?<br><br>Bugs Bunny had it right... <br><br>Beeeah, what UP, doc?<br>1.5?<br>1.5?<br><br>That's not enough, folks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19093322</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:54:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
