<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Huh?&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Huh-19112789</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:19:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:19:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Huh?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Huh-19118453</link>
<description><![CDATA[wifi4milez posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/168864" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=168864');">sporkme</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1054326" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1054326');">wifi4milez</a>:</small><br><br>The article pretty clearly outlines why they are doing this. <br> </div>I think this thread is quite possibly the worst I've seen here in a long time where folks just spout off without even glancing at the linked article...<br> </div>I agree. In all honesty, I am usually not the type of person to jump on someone for this, but the fact that it happened in comment after comment is crazy. These people are not only not reading the article, but they are also not reading the other peoples comments (and the correcting responses) related to this news items. <br><small>--<br><b>&#1103; &#1083;&#1102;&#1073;&#1083;&#1102; &#1044;&#1077;&#1085;&#1076;&#1080;!</b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Huh-19118453</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:01:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Huh?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Huh-19116211</link>
<description><![CDATA[sporkme posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1054326" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1054326');">wifi4milez</a>:</small><br><br>The article pretty clearly outlines why they are doing this. <br> </div>I think this thread is quite possibly the worst I've seen here in a long time where folks just spout off without even glancing at the linked article...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Huh-19116211</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:48:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Huh?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Huh-19113393</link>
<description><![CDATA[patcat88 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1289878" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1289878');">rickonline</a>:</small><br><br>Some stations are already in range of a signal in some spots. Sounds like a huge amount of money for coverage just in stations, not on moving trains. And the major carriers have to partner with Transit Wireless to get coverage for their subscribers. Is this really needed?<br> </div>So now we will have roaming charges in the subway? Or since most national carriers have no-roaming plans, that means we just wont have service in the subway.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Huh-19113393</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:20:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Huh?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Huh-19112906</link>
<description><![CDATA[Julio posted : *looks at profile, looks at location. Ignores comment*]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Huh-19112906</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:06:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Huh?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Huh-19112885</link>
<description><![CDATA[wifi4milez posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1157186" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1157186');">quatrix</a>:</small><br><br>Inside the subway cars, okay, but in the stations?  Who whips out their laptop during a 10-minute wait?<br> </div>Laptops?? This has nothing to do with laptops. This is so people on the platforms can use their cell phones in case of delays or emergencies. The article pretty clearly outlines why they are doing this. <br><small>--<br><b>&#1103; &#1083;&#1102;&#1073;&#1083;&#1102; &#1044;&#1077;&#1085;&#1076;&#1080;!</b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Huh-19112885</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:01:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Huh?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Huh-19112814</link>
<description><![CDATA[rickonline posted : Some stations are already in range of a signal in some spots. Sounds like a huge amount of money for coverage just in stations, not on moving trains. And the major carriers have to partner with Transit Wireless to get coverage for their subscribers. Is this really needed?<br><small>--<br>Rick</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Huh-19112814</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:49:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Huh?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Huh-19112789</link>
<description><![CDATA[quatrix posted : Inside the subway cars, okay, but in the stations?  Who whips out their laptop during a 10-minute wait?<br><br>Edit:  Never mind.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Huh-19112789</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:46:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

