site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
173
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

Democrat Party Won't Bother

I wonder why the Democrat party hasn't taken the time to introduce a permanent tax ban. It might help with Congress' 11% approval rating.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk.

lesopp

join:2001-06-27
Land O Lakes, FL

1 edit

A congress controlled by the Democratic party that permanently bans any tax would have to be a portent of the apocalypse.

Maybe they'll extend it.



pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

said by lesopp:

A congress controlled by the Democratic party that permanently bans any tax would have to be a portent of the apocalypse.
I will applaud them if they do.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk.

JSM88

join:2000-12-20
Falls Church, VA

1 edit

reply to lesopp
Both of you must now turn in your keyboards and go sit in the back of the room with the pointy caps on for the remainder of the Internet tax debate.

Let's review the facts:

1) the Original Ban on Internet taxes was written, proposed, and pushed through the Congress by a DEMOCRAT - Senator Ron Wyden or Oregon. It was the pressure from both democratic and republican former governors that serve in the Senate that prevented the ban from being permanent.

2) When the ban was renewed in 2003, again through the efforts of the DEMOCRAT, Sen. Wyden, the REPUBLICAN Senate leadership required the inclusion of an exception to allow the taxation of VOIP before they would let it move.

3) "I wonder why the Democrat party hasn't taken the time to introduce a permanent tax ban. It might help with Congress' 11% approval rating." BZZZP! A DEMOCRAT introduced a PERMANENT extension of the ban in this congress - The Wyden/McCain bill, and the only reason it hasn't moved yet is the opposition of Sen. Alexander and several other REPUBLICANS (ok and at least one DEMOCRAT, Sen. Carper.)

Anyone who still believes that Republicans are for lower taxes on folks making under $250k a year, as opposed to tax cuts for the truly wealthy and their heirs, at least any more than the Democrats, is buying a fairly old and aromatic line of bull. Both sides are equally for (and against) lower taxes for the majority of us, it's on the top 1% of incomes and estates where the parties radically diverge.


Tuesday, 29-May 04:32:26 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics