Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » The High Price Cable TV 'Cartel' » Let me pay for what I want
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Cartels  
AuthorAll Replies


Jmartz

join:2000-07-20
Tenafly, NJ


1 edit
reply to lew_jean
Re: Let me pay for what I want

Just think about it:

Everyone SHARES the cost of channels, even channels they don't watch.

A La Carte... 1/4 the number of people share the same cost (prices wont come down)... so that means the cost for the channel will increase to maintain the same revnue... so you're going to be paying the same, if not more, for LESS.

And, a lot of channels will go out of business if people don't subscribe. So you will have less to chose from, at a higher price.

It doesn't make sense to do a la carte. I prefer the packages, if Cable wants to do that, then give people a choice... people who want A La Carte can have it... but I want to keep my programming bundles.


swhx7
Premium
join:2006-07-23
Elbonia
·RoadRunner Cable

The only way ala carte would help subscribers is if all the channels were priced the same. The same as each other, that is, regardless of popularity. That way, the cablecos would make less profit as a percentage on more popular channels (because their payments to content providers are higher) and more on less popular channels. So, on ESPN and HBO they would make pennies or take a loss; on golf channel they would make more. But with larger volume on the popular channels it might almost even out.

This would be good for subscribers because it would provide an incentive for the cableco to keep the smaller channels available; and they would have to keep the bigger channels to keep customers.

If they have to offer ala carte but prices are not required to be the same for every channel, they will charge according to demand, and drop less-watched channels, and cable will descend to the lowest common denominator - just sports, big Hollywood movies and those so-called "reality" shows.

Ahrenl

join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA
·Verizon FIOS


1 edit
Or what they pay to content provider's could be tied to the number of subscribers selecting a channel. {shock} Then the providers could set the rates to what the market would actually bear, and comcast would rake some off the top for maintaining the infrastructure.. Sounds a little too free market though.. :P

bamabrad

join:2006-01-27
Port Orange, FL
reply to Jmartz
This type of business model is going the way of the dinosaurs-wait and see!
Forums » The High Price Cable TV 'Cartel'« Cartels  


Friday, 04-Dec 16:02:26 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [121] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [79] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· [DNS] Google's public DNS... performance increases? [Comcast HSI]
· People would bewalking away from the table if ACTA public [TekSavvy]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Can we go from 10 uld to 10 ony then to 10 TotC? [World of Warcraft]
· [WotLK] Doing away w/ conquest? [World of Warcraft]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]