| reply to jc100
Re: Immunity said by jc100:Best yet, and most famous, the crusades had the Christians Murdering Muslims yet again. Ah yes, good old Christianity and its blood filled past. I don't remember reading too many condemnations by the Church on these acts either. Should I conclude then that all of Christianity supports this barbarity and I have more to fear from them than the Muslims. After all, Christianity has murdered millions in the name of it's religion, too. Try to stay on-topic. The West is currently under threat by MUSLIM extremism/jihadism. |
| I am on topic. You are saying we're under thread and I am saying it's fear mongering, combined with being a bigot. To say that all 1.2 billion Muslims are out to get the U.S., might as well be concluding all 1.5 Million Christians are equally so. It's an asinine assumption that holds no merits. While a small minority wishes to perpetrate acts, its a very small minority. I already stated a few preventative measures are key. Then again, we have preventions for DUI, and other such things. However, such preventions should not be out of fear and should not remove rights. How would you like the government to say that due to murder, all americans have to wear tracking devices. Since there are 20-22,000 Murders a year, we want to be able to find you immediately if something happens. That way, if you are hurt, we can know your every move? To that, I am sure you'd say hell no, I am a big boy. SO what's the difference then? You need some overzealous government removing your freedoms in order to supposedly make you safer? You no longer a big boy, and must trade rights for supposed security. Obviously, we are no safer now than before. The only thing we are is LESS FREE. |
| Apparently, you've kept a blind eye to the Muslim extremism on display in our recent times the world over to suggest there's no threat. You know, the kind in Spain, England, Mideast and Far East? |
