republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » comments on review of TekSavvy Solutions Inc. » I could puke
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Guspaz
Guspaz
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC
reply to newf
Re: I could puke

If you're paying for three DSL connections, you may want to consider MLPPP bonding. If you're handy with Linux or BSD, TekSavvy will let you bond two or more DSL connections to make them behave (on the packet level) as one giant connection.

newf

join:2007-09-11
Brampton, ON
I've only got the one DSL connection and one of the connections will be going in the, hopefully, near future.


adisor19

join:2004-10-11
·Videotron
·Look Communications

reply to Guspaz
said by Guspaz See Profile :

If you're paying for three DSL connections, you may want to consider MLPPP bonding. If you're handy with Linux or BSD, TekSavvy will let you bond two or more DSL connections to make them behave (on the packet level) as one giant connection.
I've been reading up on that lately as i'm currently considering it. Is it really totally transparent to applications etc ? Is there any linuz/BSD distro out there with easy to use built in support for MLPPP ?

Adi


Guspaz
Guspaz
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC
·Colbanet
·TekSavvy Solutions..

It really is transparent, because it's done on the packet level. As in, either packets themselves are sent through alternating connections, or the packet itself is split in two. They're re-assembled on your ISP's end and sent out as if they came from a single source.

I'm not aware of any distro that simplifies MLPPP, and you should be warned that users have reported serious issues trying to get three lines bonded together (2 works reliably, it seems, but 3 causes issues).

The alternative is the non-transparent load balancing solution. As in, a router that load balances between DSL lines on the connection level. While not transparent, and individual transfers are limited to the speed of a single connection, multi-connection protocols (BitTorrent, accelerated HTTP, etc) would still benefit from the aggregate speeds.


adisor19

join:2004-10-11
·Videotron
·Look Communications

Hi Guspaz,

I already use a Xincom 502 to load balance my Videotron cable and Look MMDS connections and while it works ok i would like something that could benefit everything nut just multi connection protocols like Bitrorrent.. I will definitely do some more reading on MLPPP

Adi
-
Forums » comments on review of TekSavvy Solutions Inc.


Friday, 29-Aug 19:00:25 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [319] Comcast 250GB Cap Goes Live October 1
· [222] FBI To Allow Warrantless Investigations
· [134] Industry Reacts To Comcast Cap Plans
· [130] AT&T Thanks Democrats For Telecom Immunity
· [123] Time Warner Cable Cripples TiVO, Gets FCC Fine
· [119] Why Run FTTH When You Can Pretend You Do?
· [67] Telus CAPS 'Unlimited' EVDO Data Plans
· [65] Game Publishers Follow The RIAA's Lead
· [60] Qwest Defends Not Running FTTH
· [54] Dish First To Be All MPEG-4
Most people now reading
· [iPhone] Did I Buy A Fake iPhone? [All things Macintosh]
· Comcast has new Acceptable Use Policy besides the 250GB cap [Comcast HSI]
· Harley Davidson bikes should be banned [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· How-to: make ActionTec MI424-WR a network bridge [Verizon Fiber Optics]
· IMG 1.6 Deployment [Verizon FIOS TV]
· AVG 8 Free Better Than 7.5 After Tweaking [Security]
· Review AT&T U-Verse [AT&T U-verse]
· [Rant] Electricity prices [Rants, Raves, & Praise]