Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Telcos Lobby Congress For Warrantless Surveillance Immunity » First Admendment Right
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Telcos Deserve Immunity »

Cabal
Premium
join:2007-01-21
Boston, MA

Re: First Admendment Right

The article is about warrantless wiretaps, and you think this is a FIRST Amendment issue? I weep for our (clearly underfunded) schools.
--
Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?

karlmarx

join:2006-09-18
iraq
·Fairpoint Communic..

Re: First Admendment Right

Umm, NO!
Verizon claimed it was a first amendment right, the people who are suing are correct in that it was a 4th amendment violation. You should read it..

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Verizon and the others ILLEGALLY provided data and communications to the government WITHOUT a WARRANT. What part of 'unreasonable searches' and 'but upon probable cause' don't you understand. I'll summarize it for you. The government has NO RIGHT to monitor you UNLESS they have SPECIFIC information that you are engaged in criminal activity. That's why we have the justice department, to put a muzzel on 'heil bush', who quoted the bill of rights as 'just a piece of paper'.

The problem is that these companies KNOWINGLY and WILLINGLY violated ALL our rights. They should be sued into oblivion.
--
Stick it to the MAN. Support your local torrent sites. Proudly providing 100mb of upstream for all your TV, Movie, and MP3 needs.
jimbo2150

join:2004-05-10
Youngstown, OH

Re: First Admendment Right

said by karlmarx See Profile :

Umm, NO! Verizon claimed it was a first amendment right, the people who are suing are correct in that it was a 4th amendment violation. You should read it..
I agree, giving away customers' personal data is not protected by the First Amendment! It is not freedom of speech nor press. It does, however, violate their customers right to privacy (Fourth Amendment) which is something the bush administration and numerous major corporations have been doing lately! Now they just want immunity from the law? I'm rather appauled by this.
Forums » Telcos Lobby Congress For Warrantless Surveillance ImmunityTelcos Deserve Immunity »


Wednesday, 09-Dec 14:18:35 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [86] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [65] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [58] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
Most people now reading
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· HoR, PoS and FoS [World of Warcraft]
· [ Classes] ATTN Death Knights - Post your spec for critique! [World of Warcraft]
· Buzzing whatchamacallit in ceiling...?? Help identify. [Home Repair & Improvement]
· The aftermath [World of Warcraft]
· MicroSoft Discontinues Sale of Windows 7 Family Pack in US [Microsoft Help]
· New PvE Content [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]