 amungusPremium join:2004-11-26 America Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to DHRacer
Re: Confused $85 per year ...which would be ~$7/month extra...
Still, 'net access is already priced about where it should be for what's available, in most cases. Any increases would truly be a shame, esp. in the form of taxation...
Most states (all?) do require in-state tax. That seems fair, and is usually pretty normal. It's been working fine for years anyway. I mean, it makes sense to me at least.
"Of course, it would also probably turn into an abused fund just like the USF, "
Yep. Agreed. |
 DHRacerFire Survivor join:2000-10-10 Lake Arrowhead, CA Reviews:
·Charter
·Verizon Online DSL
| ahh. per year. I was thinking per month, which was getting my "revolution!" sense all a tingling.
Seriously, we can't make do with the taxes we already have that should have died already, so considering past performance, I don't see why we need new avenues for fiscal abuse. -- "No one will believe you solved this problem in one day! We've been working on it for months. Now, go act busy for a few weeks and I'll let you know when it's time to tell them." (R&D Supervisor, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing /3M Corp.) |