<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Hmm... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19148873</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:07:56 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:07:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Hmm...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19148873</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/429050"><b>La Luna</b></A> : ...wonder if Vonage will try to take this further up the appeals food chain. There seems to be some serious question as to whether Verizon's "patent" claims are even legitimate:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/shownews/Verizon-VoIP-Patents-Legitimate-83084">Verizon VoIP Patents Legitimate?</A><br><br>As mentioned previously, this (Verizon/Sprint) is nothing more than the telcos trying to squash competition that they don't want to compete with because it would mean slashing their gazillion dollar profit margin to give customers a good service at a great price. I should pay $60 a month after taxes and hidden fees for a barebones, no LD phone line instead of $32.99 for unlimited calling anywhere, including Europe, with rock solid Vonage? I don't think so.<br><br>It's pretty sad that suing is Verizon/Sprint's answer to competition instead of coming up with an equitable solution and a delivering a competitive service for the same price.<br><small>--<br><b><A HREF="http://www.jihadwatch.org/">JIHAD WATCH</a></b>~~<b><A HREF="http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/">9582 DEADLY TERROR ATTACKS SINCE 9/11</a></b>~~<b><A HREF="/forum/disco">TEAM DISCOVERY</a></b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19148873</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:36:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
