 PlaceboPremium
join:2005-12-14
Huntley, IL | reply to ropeguru
Re: controversial or unsavory-- how about LEGAL / NORMAL For NARAL to send the messages, it requires Verizon to provide access to thier network. Verizon chooses not to provide access. Would you expect Verizon to provide access to ANY organization?
I'd argue that I'm not "clueless". Dish Network offers local HD channels throughout the country--I'm pretty sure they offer over 100 channels throughout the country. I can't get all 100. Is my analogy so off base?
--
Who wants an orange whip? Orange whip? Orange whip? Three orange whips. |
|
|
|
 sporkmedrop the crantini and move it, sisterPremium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
 ·Optimum Online
| said by Placebo:F I'd argue that I'm not "clueless". I'd argue that your brain fell out of your right ear. |
|
 huntml
join:2002-01-23
Mullica Hill, NJ | reply to Placebo
Yes, common carrier -- I expect them to provide opt-in access to their network, for their customers, for any legal content. |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
 ·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to Placebo
said by Placebo:For NARAL to send the messages, it requires Verizon to provide access to thier network. Maybe Verizon should monitor all phone calls. That way if NARAL calls a volunteer on the phone they could block the call. Is this what you suggest?
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) |
|
