<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Dish Network Is Now The New AT&#x26;T ???&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Dish-Network-Is-Now-The-New-ATT-19154942</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:07:01 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:07:01 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Dish Network Is Now The New AT&#x26;T ???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Dish-Network-Is-Now-The-New-ATT-19157544</link>
<description><![CDATA[Old_Grouch posted : I figure they just want a way to stay on a NEXTEL Cup car after next year.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Dish-Network-Is-Now-The-New-ATT-19157544</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:01:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Dish Network Is Now The New AT&#x26;T ???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Dish-Network-Is-Now-The-New-ATT-19154942</link>
<description><![CDATA[KA3SGM posted : IF the deal goes through, please don't let them hammer us with years of advertising about their new name.<br><br>The Cingular name change adds are already bad enough  :(<br><small>--<br>We're Gonna Need A Bigger Boat !!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Dish-Network-Is-Now-The-New-ATT-19154942</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:39:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

