Reviews:
 ·Choice Cable TV
 ·Coqui/PRTC
| reply to openbox9
Re: What's Wrong With I was asking the same thing myself. This seems like they are inventing the wheel when Iridium has been up almost since the beginning of time...  Well not quite but probably since almost 10 years ago. |
|
 scotsAre we there yet??Premium
join:1999-12-06
Raleigh, NC
kudos:1
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| It hasn't quite been 10 years yet. Iridium was launched on Nov 1, 1998. It went bankrupt less than a year later. The service was (and still is) way too expensive for most people. The phones are huge with biga$$ antennas, and as with any other type of satellite service they only work outdoors with a clear line of site to the sky. |
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2 | said by scots:The service was (and still is) way too expensive for most people. But the only real benefactor of this type of service will be emergency response teams, where cost typically isn't a concern. Besides, I don't see TerreStar's service plans being too awfully affordable considering the relatively large cost of launching satellites into orbit.said by scots:The phones are huge with biga$$ antennas, and as with any other type of satellite service they only work outdoors with a clear line of site to the sky. And what would you expect these new terminals to be like for TerreStar's network? |
|
| Money is an issue for rural government budgets openbox,
Cost will be a factor in rural counties, especially those out West with a large federal presence that doesn't pay property or state income taxes on the property it holds or federal revenues generated by fees or services (yes, eminent domain means Uncle Sam can take, but don't expect him to give in return). I'm in a mountainous region in the northern Rockies and we have no problems with first responder communications via radio. This proposed solution isn't needed, is too expensive and putting yet more junk to orbit in space around us. |
|
