<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>remote code execution flaw in OpenSSL in Security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19171880</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:13:41 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:13:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: remote code execution flaw in OpenSSL</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19172043</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/634007"><b>SUMware</b></A> : 2007/09/19 - Fix committed to the OpenSSL_0_9_8-stable branch in CVS.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19172043</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:40:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>remote code execution flaw in OpenSSL</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19171880</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : OpenSSL is prone to an off-by-one buffer-overflow vulnerability because the library fails to properly bounds-check user-supplied input before copying it to an insufficiently sized memory buffer.<br><br>Successfully exploiting this issue may allow attackers to execute arbitrary machine code in the context of applications that use the affected library<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/480855" >www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/480855</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19171880</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:03:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
