| I don't think so! hmmmmmm,
Single native American mother of 2. That's perfect!
Yea, they are going to throw the book at her over "allegedly" downloading music......I DON'T THINK SO!
I'd call the RIAA's bluff with that hand any day! They have already done the math and know they can't win in the court of public opinion! They will make this quietly go away somehow.
If all these people they are threatening with lawsuits stood up to the RIAA this whole stunt would be over tomorrow. No way the RIAA would spend money on 30,000 individual lawsuits. NO WAY! |
|
|
|
 53059959Temp banned from BBR more then anyone
join:2002-10-02
PwnZone | yeah you think they would go after some greasy 30 year old who still lives in his parents basement, but oh no wait-they are years ahead of the riaa. ahahah!
riaa will just end up getting it dismissed without prejudice and they will succeed in ruining her life on way or another |
|
ncbillPremium
join:2007-01-23
Winston Salem, NC | reply to phoneboy3
Single Native American mother of 2...
Isn't she judgment-proof already?
I bet her earnings are too low for garnishment.
Probably no house or other attachable assets. |
|
| If she doesn't have any assets, she probably can't afford a good lawyer. And therefore this case will be an easy win for the RIAA... and therefore set precedence for any new cases brought to court. |
|
 elios
join:2005-11-15
Springfield, MO | no theres TONS of them that will take the case free just to stick it to the RIAA |
|
| said by elios:no theres TONS of them that will take the case free just to stick it to the RIAA Too bad one of these lawyers didn't step up to the plate. Her lawyer's defense SUCKED.
As I said, this just sets precedence for any future lawsuits. |
|
