Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | reply to Rick
Re: Not sure I agree Your analogy stinks. (as most do)
To make it correct, the tennant would only be using half the space, and the landlord would have the ability to dynamically lease the unused space unless the tenant wanted to use it. There would also be minimums on how little space the tenant could pay for, even if they aren't using it.
While I think it should be up to Sprint if they want to let you pay for less minutes, it's certainly in their best interest to let you ammend the contract to pay for more.
Of course the whole point of the contract is to cover the phone subsidy. Since every contract size gets the same subsidy (by length) then, you can argue, Sprint loses nothing, since the contract size doesn't effect the benefit the customer receives. |
