So in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19195780 en Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:31:09 EDT Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:31:09 EDT Re: So http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19208441 Ahrenl : I'm not saying you don't, but if you think you're getting good jobs at job fairs, then that's where our miscommunication is. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19208441 Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:36:27 EDT Re: So http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19202277 CylonRed : No more anecdotal than yours and yes - we have a LOT of job fairs in this area with 2 universities and a major AFB.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19202277 Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:53:32 EDT Re: So http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19201900 Ahrenl : Well, experience tends to make common sense useful. Without further information, your post doesn't even count as ancedotal. Job fairs? You really have no idea do you. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19201900 Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:55:13 EDT Re: So http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19198873 CylonRed : Ummm - my father got a job without needing a resume online (actually 2 jobs) and then there are job fairs... Really - a internet connections is NOT mandatory - a lot of the professional jobs that are gotten are via friends and collegues and not online. My IL's (father, mother, sister and brother) never had their resume's online nor did that have to email it - there is a things called phones and mail - still commonly used everyday.

While the internet makes it easier - it is hardly mandatory.

I just used common sense that is all...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19198873 Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:12:02 EDT Re: So http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19198586 Ahrenl : The airways are a public network, leased out by the government for that specific purpose. The FCC also has indecencies laws (which are really just censorship) that allow them to levy fines for what some magical power decides is indecent. But now you're talking about TV.

Why? Because fair use was changed when they bought and paid for the DCMA. (or is it DMCA?) Anyway, what does that have to do with pirated content? YOU'RE not recording it, someone else is. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19198586 Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:22:10 EDT Re: So http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19198558 Ahrenl : If I answer every question that has no bearing on what it is quoting we'll be here all night... and it kind of smells here.. {sniff}]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19198558 Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:17:37 EDT Re: So http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19198554 Ahrenl : When's the last time you changed professions or hired someone?

While on occasion I've been handed a resume from a colleague as reference (which was emailed itself, and thus facilitated the reference), I've actually never hired (or heard of someone being hired) someone who was not posted through the network.

But of course, you know all.. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19198554 Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:16:46 EDT Re: So http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19197224 benc : I fail to see the connection. Don't you mail in your resume to get a job?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19197224 Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:08:37 EDT Re: So http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19196681 CylonRed :
said by Ahrenl See Profile :

And before you bring the utility argument, please understand that it is not possible to get a job that pays above the poverty level without an internet connection. At least not in the Urban/Suburban areas.
Good god - BS galore...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19196681 Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:41:34 EDT Re: So http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19195970 A P CC :
said by Ahrenl See Profile :

There are no laws for what content AT&T can allow on their networks. In fact, as long as they have universal carrier status, they're not even responsible for illegal content on their network.

The only issue is that filtering content might remove their universal carrier status, thus making them libel for illegal content. But, under law, they can block ANYTHING they want. They could make it so that customers could ONLY get to the ATT.net portal if they chose.
but 2 questions/statement,
(1) ISN'T it against the FCC law or rule or (just an "unserstanding among the entertaiment/ broadcasting (TV) industry, that no SMUT.(xxx) will be broadcasted over the airways?

2 WHY shouldn't I be allowed to (IF i am paying for a service, (ie stars,time warner Directv,ect) be able to recorded the movies that are shown (for my own private collection) & burned onto a dvd?

jazzy
--
SOME people make use of a chat forum the same way public walls are used for graffiti,I don't feel compelled to respond to their graffiti ,then I feel equally at ease about ignoring they're post,I'll go about making my post & having fun wih FRIENDS.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19195970 Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:34:17 EDT Re: So http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19195887 openbox9 :
said by Ahrenl See Profile :

And before you bring the utility argument, please understand that it is not possible to get a job that pays above the poverty level without an internet connection. At least not in the Urban/Suburban areas.
Did you pirate your resume? What does obtaining employment have to do with blocking unauthorized content?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19195887 Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:19:10 EDT Re: So http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19195828 Ahrenl :

There are no laws for what content AT&T can allow on their networks. In fact, as long as they have universal carrier status, they're not even responsible for illegal content on their network.

The only issue is that filtering content might remove their universal carrier status, thus making them libel for illegal content. But, under law, they can block ANYTHING they want. They could make it so that customers could ONLY get to the ATT.net portal if they chose.

Which is why service providers shouldn't be allowed to own national infrastructure without HEAVY regulation. Imagine if your electric company only dispersed electricity to appliances that they sold. And before you bring the utility argument, please understand that it is not possible to get a job that pays above the poverty level without an internet connection. At least not in the Urban/Suburban areas. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19195828 Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:08:30 EDT So http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19195780 jgkolt : Did they barrow some servers from China's internet brigade or are they just not for free speech on their network. I can see someone suing them because they blocked a site and the site is now losing revenue because of it. Maybe in ads or other sales. Isn't their a law against fair competition? How about one site banned has ads from a competing company. They would be in fact unfairly reducing competition unfairly. Can a lawyer speak up and continue on here and offer his two cents.
--
»www.LakeSemaJ.com
3 free trades for me, 3 free for you. PM Me
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19195780 Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:01:12 EDT