site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Asmodeus

join:2004-05-26
Spring Valley, CA

reply to moschops

Re: "Pirated content" filtering

said by moschops:

If they start filtering "pirated content" it is only a mater of time before they decide to start filtering "illegal content". But "illegal content" is whatever the courts say it is that week.
can you please tell us which court has deemed something as illegal content and on which week...? i'd like to know so i can do my proper due diligence based on the hyperbole you've just made a claim to... thank you...

moschops
Premium
join:2003-12-20
Oakland, CA

I think you missed the "it is only a mater of time before" part.

Regardless you seem to have forgotten there is already plenty of content deemed illegal - child porn would be one example, and the story is about another kind - copyright infringing content.

The question is would networks dare to start preemptively filtering content? I think the original story makes this obvious - yes.

But once you cite "national security" during a national crisis scenario virtually anything can be made illegal and get passed into law as Patriot I and II have proved. It can then take years for the Supreme Court to go back and overule such things as unconstitutional.

We may laugh about the Great China Firewall and how restricted the Chinese are, but it is clear that we are now laying the foundations for our very own wall - one packet filter at a time.

Cue Pink Floyd music...


Tuesday, 29-May 08:19:55 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics