<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Let&#x27;s see if I have this right... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19197869</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:31:52 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:31:52 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Let&#x27;s see if I have this right...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19197869</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/217284"><b>wtansill</b></A> : A company (or companies) lobbies for a set of rules attempting to obtain favor on its/their behalf.  The company's CongressCritter and others like him (her?), pass the bill that the company lobbied to get.  The company now finds that, to its surprise and chagrin, someone <b>other than it</b> is making a nice profit by adhering to the letter of the law that the company lobbied for (and given the way Washington works, a law that company-funded lobbyists likely helped draft), and now the company says that this is a bad thing???<br><br>You'll pardon me, I trust, if I do not shed a tear for them...<br><small>--<br>"In every generation, there are those who want to rule well - but they mean to rule. They promise to be good masters - but they mean to be master."<br>--Daniel Webster<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19197869</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:06:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
