dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
7
share rss forum feed


Stonehawk
Stay Low And Let It Blow
Premium
join:2001-05-17
Deerfield, WI
kudos:1
reply to FFH

Re: FCC will be correcting this abuse of rural telecom subsidy

said by FFH:

said by Karl Bode:


The irony being, if we're remembering correctly, that these rules were lobbied for by these telecom giants.
I think you may remember incorrectly. AT&T didn't lobby for those rules. They were forced down their throat by Judge Greene when Ma Bell was broken up because he didn't want rural carriers to go belly up. The future Baby Bells went along with it because they didn't have a choice. And there weren't telecom giants at that time. There was 1 giant - AT&T.

»online.wsj.com/article/SB1191460···imary_hs
But the key was federal rules drafted during the 1983 break-up of Ma Bell, which required big telecom companies to pay hefty fees to small carriers to compensate for the high cost of providing service across miles of sparse farmland.
And it looks like the FCC is going to modify these rules because they aren't being used to keep rural phone companies alive, but so that a few individuals can make their profits thru loopholes.

»online.wsj.com/article/SB1191460···imary_hs
an investigation by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission into the high fees some rural carriers charged to the Bells. Late Tuesday, the FCC proposed rules that, if approved, are likely to prevent such deals in the future.
Here is the FCC news release on this:
»fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/a···75A1.pdf
The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking:
»fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/a···76A1.pdf
I don't usually post on the news items, but this was too much to pass up. I understand the history behind this rule that the local telephone exchanges are using to boost their profits. I also understand that the FCC is looking to modify these rules, so the few rural exchanges using this will be stopped.

My question, is when is the FCC going to modify the rules for the USF, so the few BIG telcos don't profit from it like they are now? Hmmm? How about some equality in the application of the rules for rural and big telcos?

Just a question

Jerry