republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
116
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

mdd

join:2004-09-28
Los Angeles, CA

One more thing

The real criminals here are not the telcos, it is the agents in the government who COMPELLED them to comply with an illegal wiretapping program. Save most of your indignation for them.

-R


MacWin

join:2003-06-26
Imperial, MO

said by mdd:

The real criminals here are not the telcos, it is the agents in the government who COMPELLED them to comply with an illegal wiretapping program. Save most of your indignation for them.

-R
I'm sure that AT&T had to have their arm twisted on this one. They used this to get their BellSouth meger approved on the quick.

ross

join:2000-08-16

reply to mdd

said by mdd:

The real criminals here are not the telcos, it is the agents in the government who COMPELLED them to comply with an illegal wiretapping program. Save most of your indignation for them.

-R
Horseshit! The Telcos had a fiduciary duty to protect their customers from the illegal, unwarranted requests and actions of the White House. It is clear that one cannot be lawfully compelled to break the law. And further, in the instance of illegal wiretapping and wholesale eavesdropping on voice telecommunications, internet traffic/e-mail and standard mail, the administration operated well beyond the constraints of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and the authority granted the Executive thereby. In fact, they operated outside the bounds of all law in the United States of America. The Telcos, and all others, who cooperated with the megalomaniacal dementia manifested in the White House are legally liable for their actions. This point was decided at Nurhenburg.


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000

reply to mdd
riiiight. so now deflect the blame away from telcos and to some mysterious person that forced them to spit on the constitution? they had a choice. they made the wrong choice. they should be sued into non-existance.


Tuesday, 29-May 10:36:49 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics