lev
Napoleon is always right
Premium,Ex-mod 2002-08
join:2001-05-30
Chicago, IL
clubs: 
 ·AT&T Midwest
| reply to p9ing
Re: Cannot connect during mornings
said by p9ing  :I posted in ATTDirect last night, and as of this morning I am once again able to authenticate and surf. Thanks everyone! Don't thank too soon. Nobody responded to your post, so it's probably coincidence. |
|
Mountaineer1
Big WVU Fan
Premium,MVM
join:2002-01-12
Universe
·AT&T Yahoo
| reply to p9ing
I'm sure one of the Techs in the at&t Direct forum will get you straightened-out,as soon as they become available to look at your post. Those guys/gals are pretty good at getting to the problem,and directing it to the appropriate dept. .
--
Got a Clark,Crown,Drexel forklift and need technical advice? Ask me about it. |
|
p9ing
join:2002-08-27
Champaign, IL | reply to p9ing
I posted in ATTDirect last night, and as of this morning I am once again able to authenticate and surf.
Thanks everyone! |
|
p9ing
join:2002-08-27
Champaign, IL
| reply to p9ing
User StillLearn IM'd me to point out in the FAQ where the generic user sbcyahooreg can be tested.
The sbcyahooreg authentication test was not successful with either the 4100b (with PPP on the modem) or with my old 5360 (with PPP on the computer). |
|
p9ing
join:2002-08-27
Champaign, IL | reply to d_l
I'll take a look. It might be a bit before I can view the logs and get back to an internet connection. |
|
d_l
Barsoom
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-08
Reno, NV
| reply to p9ing
Arrrgh!  I wasn't reading closely enough at the start of the thread about the "mornings - no authentication; evenings - authentication permitted".
This is probably a situation for the tech in AT&T Direct: »/forum/sbcdirect. Post a Trouble thread there ASAP. 
I'm curious. Does the modem log say anything about what precedes the loss of authentication in the morning? I'm assuming that you leave the connection up all night and wake up to no PPPoE connection. |
|
p9ing
join:2002-08-27
Champaign, IL
| reply to d_l
No worries. I had thought of the domain part, too, but I do have the @ameritech.net part included. I have also tried copy-pasting from my PPP configuration file on the computer as a check.
Just to recap, I had connectivity up through 9/28/07 or 9/29/07. Then over the course of about week, I was losing connectivity in the morning before I left for work. Power-cycling helped establish a new connection, but that connection would get lost after a few minutes of activity. When I came home, I power-cycled again, and then connectivity was stable. Currently there is no connectivity.
Hmm...this would have been just about one month into a new speed tier. I wonder if something didn't get renewed. |
|
d_l
Barsoom
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-08
Reno, NV
| reply to p9ing
OK. I just asked that question to make it clear if the authentication failure was happening by itself (which it is) or if it was caused by failure at the lower level ATM layer.
Any chance that your ID and/or PW are entered incorrectly? Just a reminder, the ID now requires the "@ameritech.net" or the "@sbcglobal.net" domain name.
Don't think I'm trying to insult your intelligence here by suggesting the domain name in the ID, but just recently someone lost their internet connectivity that wasn't using the domain name. Supposedly the domain name has been a requirement for authentication for several years or more, but somehow they managed to escape having to use it until recently and were unaware of the requirement. Once they added to their ID, their authentication problems were fixed. |
|
p9ing
join:2002-08-27
Champaign, IL
| reply to d_l
said by d_l :The DSL layer looks great. Do all the other diagnostic tests pass on this page?: » 192.168.0.1/diags.htm Ethernet, ADSL, ATM -- pass
PPPoE, Authentication -- fail
IP, DNS -- skipped
PPPoE connection to ethernet -- pass
PPP connection to PPPoE -- pass
PPPoE server connectivity -- pass
PPPoE server session -- fail
It said "the far end did not respond to PPPoE requests" on, I believe it was, the login page. |
|
d_l
Barsoom
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-08
Reno, NV | reply to p9ing
The DSL layer looks great. Do all the other diagnostic tests pass on this page?: »192.168.0.1/diags.htm |
|
p9ing
join:2002-08-27
Champaign, IL
| reply to Mountaineer1
dmt_spectrum |
deblin's tool results:
Downstream Maxrate (Estimated): 8420
Upstream Maxrate (Estimated): 972
Bit tones with notches/missing bits:
bit(s) 38:45 163.875 - 198.375 KHz
bit(s) 77:85 332.0625- 370.875 KHz
bit(s) 88:96 379.5 - 418.3125KHz
bit(s) 129:131 556.3125- 569.25KHz
bit(s) 147 633.9375- 638.25KHz |
|
Mountaineer1
Big WVU Fan
Premium,MVM
join:2002-01-12
Universe
·AT&T Yahoo
| reply to p9ing
Try the Speedstream modem spectrum analysis tool that deblin created,and post your results.
--
Got a Clark,Crown,Drexel forklift and need technical advice? Ask me about it. |
|
p9ing
join:2002-08-27
Champaign, IL
| reply to Mountaineer1
I don't recall authentication failure being in the error messages. The messages had to do with PADS and other usual diagnostics. (I'm not in front of the log right now.)
Thanks for mentioning their hardware being a possible factor. I'll try to look into increasing timeout values on my end, and if that doesn't help, I'll post AT&TDirect. |
|
Mountaineer1
Big WVU Fan
Premium,MVM
join:2002-01-12
Universe
·AT&T Yahoo
| reply to p9ing
So you are getting a PPPoE authentication failure? Your SN Margin and Line Attenuation look fine. I had a similar problem a few months ago,it turned out to be a bad card in the RT that serves my area. My neighbor also had the same issue. After they(at&t)replaced the card,the problem went away.
--
Got a Clark,Crown,Drexel forklift and need technical advice? Ask me about it. |
|
p9ing
join:2002-08-27
Champaign, IL
| reply to Greg_Z
said by Greg_Z :Then, if you have the 5360, I take it you are connected to it and doing PPPoE with the computer. Yes. |
|
p9ing
join:2002-08-27
Champaign, IL
| reply to Mountaineer1
I picked up a 4100b, and am still unable to connect. I have tried swapping cables, filters, ethernet cards (computers), and modem. Best as I can get with the 4100b is the power, ethernet, and DSL lights lit steady green. The activity light flashes on once every 15 seconds or so with one computer, and will flash maybe three times every 15 seconds or so with the other computer. Normally PPPoE is run on the computer. The pppd log says "Timeout waiting for PADS packets". (I'll do a search on PADS next.)
The 4100b's diagnostic pages report the following: 3008 kbps down / 512 kbps up, software 1.0.0.63, SN margin 26.0dB, line attenuation 13.0dB. The modem came configured for hosting PPPoE itself, and in that case all four PPPoE test items were reported failed. I then changed the configuration to having PPP hosted on the computer, and it didn't fix things. |
|
Greg_Z
Premium
join:2001-08-08
Springfield, IL | reply to p9ing
Then, if you have the 5360, I take it you are connected to it and doing PPPoE with the computer. |
|
p9ing
join:2002-08-27
Champaign, IL | reply to Greg_Z
I do have a WRT54G, but it's not wired in line with the modem. |
|
Greg_Z
Premium
join:2001-08-08
Springfield, IL | reply to p9ing
Are you hooked into a Router? |
|
p9ing
join:2002-08-27
Champaign, IL | reply to Mountaineer1
Yeah, I'm going to try that because looking at the modem's activity this afternoon, it is just endlessly self-rebooting without indication of attempting to sync. I think the 5 year old modem is toast. Thanks. |
|
