Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Broadband Making Record Labels Irrelevant » Right direction
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Been a long time coming »
« Downloaded...  

major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
clubs:

Re: Right direction

said by mocycler See Profile :

said by someguy99 :

No, really, you can't. You can use the argument to justify digitally copying just about anything, but not to justify stealing
Stealing, copying, file sharing...call it what you want, you are still taking/giving away someone else's property without compensating the rightful owner. And it's still illegal.

Downloading is not illegal. It is the here and now and record companies are dinosaurs desperately trying to litigate themselves into a new century, but they don't have a chance once more bands jump on the NIN "pirate" bandwagon.

Radiohead just eliminated all the BS middlemen and have the digital equivalent of a tip jar on their site. Basically, fans have the option of paying or not to download the band's new album.
--
The Toll


Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA

Re: Right direction

Actually, downloading a copyrighted file without permission of the copyright owner is illegal (the original Napster verdict established that), however it is nearly impossible to prosecute without invasive spyware or access to all of the ISPs' log files. Even then, it would be expensive and time consuming to prosecute thousands of people for one download each. So the recording industry has to settle for suing people sharing files out and hope that the downloaders will go away if they take down enough sharers.

I do agree with the "record companies are dinosaurs" part of your post though. They are desperately trying to hold onto control over the entire music process and onto the illusion that the only good music is RIAA music. More and more their control is slipping away, though, and they're getting more and more desperate.

I don't think record labels will go away entirely in the future, but will instead evolve into entities more like advertising firms. Bands will hire a label to promote an album for a cut of the proceeds. The band will retain copyright over the album and the label can be fired with little to no ill effects on the artist if the label doesn't perform up to par. Labels in this format would be smaller entities with less control over the process (though perhaps the same number of connections with things like radio air time).
Forums » Broadband Making Record Labels IrrelevantBeen a long time coming »
« Downloaded...  


Tuesday, 01-Dec 06:22:19 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [60] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [48] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [36] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [31] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [25] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [22] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [4] Monday Evening Links
· [3] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· MagicJack Error Broken Storage [MagicJack]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· What is the best subcription ratio? [Wireless Service Providers]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]