Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T U-verse » I got a letter from AT&T.
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
VRAD Locations »
« AT&T U-Verse Elite performing sluggish! Please help.  
AuthorAll Replies


MarkyD
Premium
join:2002-08-20
Oklahoma City, OK
clubs:
·Cox HSI

reply to Nightfall
Re: I got a letter from AT&T.

said by Nightfall See Profile :

Can you post what you mailed him? I am curious to see what you wrote.
Mr. Stephenson:
I am writing in reference to your FTTP (Fiber to the Premise) product. AT&T has begun wiring Greenfield developments with FTTP in the Oklahoma City metro. My new home has AT&T FTTP service. U-Verse was supposed to be available in my area August 6th, but us FTTP users are still out in the cold.
I applaud AT&T for trying to bring a product to compete with Cox, Comcast, etc. However, you are imposing the same limitations on FTTP and FTTN areas, which seems a little short sighted. Why push FTTP to Greenfield developments if you’re not going to use that fiber to its full capacity? Even on FTTP, the max internet speeds are 6/1mbps. Cox is offering 12/1 in the area, and there are rumors of 15/2mbps on the horizon.
Additionally, you are limiting even the FTTP U-Verse installs to one simultaneous HD stream. The fiber has the capacity to handle several HD streams + much faster internet speeds. Why make a product inferior to what the competition is offering when it is capable of so much better? Why do you impose the same limitations on FTTP U-Verse as you do on FTTN U-Verse? Why can Verizon offer 50/10mbps speeds on FiOS, but all AT&T can give me on a similar platform is 6/1?
The time is nearing where I am going to jump ship to Cox unless AT&T can make their offerings a little more competitive. I realize that AT&T losing one customer is no big deal, but I can tell you that the general public is becoming VERY aware of the difference between AT&T/Cable in terms of speed and functionality. Power users/telecommuters such as myself, who rely on technologies such as VPN, large file transfers, and other bandwidth hungry activities on a daily basis, have a genuine need for more bandwidth.
In conclusion, I would ask that you take a good look at the neutered product that is currently being offered over your FTTP platform. Look at what the competition is offering, and then ask yourself why you are shooting yourselves in the foot.
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T U-verseVRAD Locations »
« AT&T U-Verse Elite performing sluggish! Please help.  


Wednesday, 02-Dec 08:24:28 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [153] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [69] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [60] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [56] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [52] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [45] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [35] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [26] Vivendi Agrees, Comcast/NBC Deal Soon
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Phish] email from CDC "personal vaccination profile" [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Furnace starts, then shuts off. [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Ooma changing features [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Config] cisco asa 5505 with multiple outside IP addresses [Cisco]
· Wind getting a little more aggressive [TekSavvy]
· Data Usage Meter Launched [Comcast HSI]
· UBB round 2 at the CRTC [Canadian Broadband]