jackknife
join:2001-02-24
Phoenix, AZ
clubs: | reply to DJ_Kismuth
Re: sux
Cable companies get their channels from satellites and then distribute them over their cables. So, exactly how are wires better? |
|
whocares
Premium
join:2003-07-26
..
| said by jackknife  :Cable companies get their channels from satellites and then distribute them over their cables. So, exactly how are wires better? jackknife,DJ_Kismuth must think that the cable go from his home out to a poll,then arcoss the nation or through the Forrest & under the sea to the station doing the actual broadcast station & the world is flat,
I hate to have to tell him the world is round
--
SOME people are quick to point out others mistakes,
and have a closed mind and R TO BLIND,to SEE their OWN mistakes & only know how to critize.
Others know how to discuss an issue.WHICH R YOU?
|
|
kyler13
Is your fiber grounded?
join:2006-12-12
Arnold, MD
| reply to jackknife
said by jackknife :Cable companies get their channels from satellites and then distribute them over their cables. So, exactly how are wires better? Easy. I can get all my HD channels through one wire, along with phone and high speed internet. On the other hand, it apparently takes about 12 satellites to get all the channels down to a single customer, WITH a 33% cut in HD resolution.
In simple terms: satellite bandwidth sucks. |
|
whocares
Premium
join:2003-07-26
..
| Easy. I can get all my HD channels through one wire, along with phone and high speed internet. On the other hand, it apparently takes about 12 satellites to get all the channels down to a single customer, WITH a 33% cut in HD resolution.
==========================================
and you forgot the most important thing,
you get to pay 2 to 3 x's the amount for cable that sattelite users have to pay
jazzy
--
SOME people are quick to point out others mistakes,
and have a closed mind and R TO BLIND,to SEE their OWN mistakes & only know how to critize.
Others know how to discuss an issue.WHICH R YOU?
|
|
