| The whole things was a mountain out of a mole hill This was just some issue made up by some groups on a crusade for laws about network neutrality. There was never any danger to the customers. So they change the wording and the advocacy groups lose 1 more battle.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page |
|
 Jovi
join:2000-02-24
Mount Joy, PA | Do you ever side with the little guy TCH? Ever.....? Almost seems like corporate America is lining your pockets to post on their behalf. 
--
"Where's my coffee? Oh. I guess it's my turn to make it."  |
|
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
said by fAcEtIOUs:This was just some issue made up by some groups on a crusade for laws about network neutrality. There was never any danger to the customers. So they change the wording and the advocacy groups lose 1 more battle. Talk about imaginary stories... |
|
|
|
 81399672Premium
join:2006-05-17
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:2 | reply to Jovi
said by Jovi:Do you ever side with the little guy TCH? Ever.....? Almost seems like corporate America is lining your pockets to post on their behalf. Yes, that is the feeling i have gotten long time ago |
|
1 edit | reply to fAcEtIOUs
Who are these groups that you refer to and what does this have to do with network neutrality? |
|
 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD | reply to ross
said by ross:Talk about imaginary stories... When did AT&T or Verizon terminate any customers based on the clause in question?
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk. |
|
| reply to Nightshade
said by Nightshade:Who are these groups that you refer to and what does this have to do with network neutrality? From the BBR story:
Obviously both telcos have been working overtime to fight network neutrality laws, and aren't eager to give political opponents any ammunition.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page |
|
1 edit | Well I can see where you got the network neutrality thing from but still consider it a stretch. But political opponents are pretty vague as a group.
How I read the clause is pretty vague too. I don't see Verizon or AT&T to go after individual customers because they got bigger fish to fry. But how the clauses were written as is were vague enough for them to do so if they so desired. But the reason why they didn't do it is because the backlash they would get from current customers or ex customers who lost service because they expressed their opinions about the service.
But I am glad Verizon and AT&T are getting rid of the clauses. No harm, no foul.
--
True Happiness Must Come From Within |
|
