<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Privacy: Protection or Control. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19239116</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:41:02 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:41:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Privacy: Protection or Control.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19239116</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Privacy is a concept under siege. Between Schwartzenegger's passing of a law in California to invade smoker's privacy in their own cars, and wiretapping <A HREF="http://http:dsl-experts.net">dsl</a> connections I am at a loss to express which is worse.<br><br>All the recent erosions of privacy are founded on the basis that the government is only doing it to protect us.<br><br>For some reason my brain is not wrapping around that very willingly. Appears to me it's more about the power to control behavior. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19239116</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:00:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
