<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Doesn&#x27;t it take years to come up with any data in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19249150</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:03:38 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:03:38 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Doesn&#x27;t it take years to come up with any data</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19249589</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1376598"><b>swhx7</b></A> : Cell phones have been in use long enough that if there is, for example, a 10-year latency period for health effects, we should start seeing mass effects soon, if there will be any.<br><br>As you emphasize, most studies have not found short-term harmful effects from low-power sources. High power sources are known to be harmful (this is why a microwave oven is required to be sealed when in operation, for example).<br><br>Study of high-power sources and of long-term effects has been hindered by conflicts of interest. See for example, &raquo;<A HREF="http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7025" >globalresearch.ca/index.php?cont&middot;&middot;&middot;aid=7025</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19249589</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:25:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Doesn&#x27;t it take years to come up with any data</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19249150</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  HardwareGeek <A HREF="/useremail/u/900037"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Most health studies I read about take 10 to 20 years. So I doubt there will be any data anytime soon proving or disproving that wi-fi is a health risk.<br> </div>There have been studies done on non-ionizing radiation for decades and no proof has been found yet that <b>"low power devices"</b> can do any harm. While WiFi is relatively new, it isn't significantly different from other similar devices that have been used for decades.<br><br>Here is a good easy to understand web page on the issues of non-ionizing radiation and potential hazards. &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.hko.gov.hk/radiation/tidbit/200706/wireless_e.htm" >www.hko.gov.hk/radiation/tidbit/&middot;&middot;&middot;ss_e.htm</A><br><br>But you are right, in that if you want to rule out WiFi specifically, studies will take a very long time to provide definite lack of harm.<br><small>--<br>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb">Internet News</a><br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h">My BLOG</a><br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto">My Web Page</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19249150</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:53:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Doesn&#x27;t it take years to come up with any data</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19249108</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/900037"><b>HardwareGeek</b></A> : Most health studies I read about take 10 to 20 years. So I doubt there will be any data anytime soon proving or disproving that wi-fi is a health risk.<br><small>--<br>Email/MSN: Michael at hardwaregeeks.comAIM: MikeR35292</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19249108</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:46:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
