<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Atmospheric Radiation is much worse in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19250590</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:38:25 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:38:25 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Atmospheric Radiation is much worse</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19258486</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/326902"><b>james</b></A> : Sure there are worse things that we cannot control, but that's no reason not to change the things we CAN control.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19258486</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:22:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Atmospheric Radiation is much worse</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19250590</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/148968"><b>JAXx</b></A> : Atmospheric Radiation is much worse for you and there is no protection from it (except for UV).  Life is dangerous and as they say, there is no getting out of it alive.....<br><small>--<br>JAXx, aka Stephen<br>~ All my opinions are only my opinions and if anyone else shares them - it's chance ~</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19250590</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:13:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
