<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: It would be nice.... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19261956</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:54:39 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:54:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: It would be nice....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19261956</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1489746"><b>siouxmoux</b></A> : If ATT U-verse would offer speeds of 24/2 I would jump ship from comcast to U-verse in a instant. Since comcast in sf/sj bay area should be rolling out their blast tier 16/2 in 2008.  10/1 would not make the grade for me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19261956</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:43:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>It would be nice....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19260007</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : To put some of that unused capacity to work, wether its multiple HD streams or faster net.<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19260007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:54:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
